Comments on: Terrific Article from www.WebProNews.com — Bad Content Equals Bad Sales http://marketing-junkie.com/terrific-article-from-wwwwebpronewscom-bad-content-equals-bad-sales/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=terrific-article-from-wwwwebpronewscom-bad-content-equals-bad-sales Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:45:08 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: james palmer http://marketing-junkie.com/terrific-article-from-wwwwebpronewscom-bad-content-equals-bad-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-6117 james palmer Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:11:20 +0000 http://marketing-junkie.com/terrific-article-from-wwwwebpronewscom-bad-content-equals-bad-sales/#comment-6117 [...] Tim Baldini and Paul James Palmer play their parts well, and even when they descend into petty ...Terrific Article from www.WebProNews.com Bad Content Equals ...I'm a readaholic. Which is a good thing in my industry. Because I read tons of books, newsletters [...] [...] Tim Baldini and Paul James Palmer play their parts well, and even when they descend into petty …Terrific Article from http://www.WebProNews.com Bad Content Equals …I'm a readaholic. Which is a good thing in my industry. Because I read tons of books, newsletters [...]

]]> By: James Palmer http://marketing-junkie.com/terrific-article-from-wwwwebpronewscom-bad-content-equals-bad-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-5 James Palmer Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:17:57 +0000 http://marketing-junkie.com/terrific-article-from-wwwwebpronewscom-bad-content-equals-bad-sales/#comment-5 Great article, Stacy. Thanks for sharing! Too many websites are guilty of what the article talks about, but not only is there often not enough information, but the copy that is there is intentionally unclear, filled with corporatese like "we enhance the systemization of optimizational processes to enhance customization." Huh? Thanks for setting us straight. James Palmer Great article, Stacy. Thanks for sharing!

Too many websites are guilty of what the article talks about, but not only is there often not enough information, but the copy that is there is intentionally unclear, filled with corporatese like “we enhance the systemization of optimizational processes to enhance customization.” Huh?

Thanks for setting us straight.

James Palmer

]]>